Point Estimation and Estimators

Basic Concepts of Point Estimation

Definition of Point Estimation

Point Estimator

Let the distribution function of the population XX be F(x;θ)F(x;\theta), where θ\theta is the unknown parameter and θ∈Θ\theta \in \Theta. Draw a sample X1,X2,…,XnX_1, X_2, \dots, X_n from the population and construct the statistic θ^=θ^(X1,X2,…,Xn)\hat{\theta} = \hat{\theta}(X_1, X_2, \dots, X_n) to estimate the parameter θ\theta; then θ^\hat{\theta} is called a point estimator of the parameter θ\theta, or simply an estimator.

Difference Between an Estimator and an Estimate

Estimator: θ^=θ^(X1,X2,…,Xn)\hat{\theta} = \hat{\theta}(X_1, X_2, \dots, X_n) is a random variable

Estimate: θ^=θ^(x1,x2,…,xn)\hat{\theta} = \hat{\theta}(x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n) is a concrete numerical value

Intuitive Understanding of Point Estimation

Understanding: point estimation uses sample information to estimate the concrete numerical value of a population parameter. Since the sample is random, the estimator is random as well, so we need criteria for evaluating the quality of an estimator.

Criteria for Evaluating Estimators

Unbiasedness

Unbiased Estimator

If the expectation of the estimator θ^\hat{\theta} equals the parameter being estimated, namely θ\theta, that is: E(θ^)=θE(\hat{\theta}) = \theta then θ^\hat{\theta} is called an unbiased estimator of the parameter θ\theta.

Significance: unbiasedness means that the expected value of the estimator equals the true value, so in the long run the estimate does not systematically deviate from the true value.

Example 1: the sample mean X‾=1n∑i=1nXi\overline{X} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n X_i is an unbiased estimator of the population mean μ\mu.

Proof: E(X‾)=E(1n∑i=1nXi)=1n∑i=1nE(Xi)=1n⋅nμ=μE(\overline{X}) = E(\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n X_i) = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n E(X_i) = \frac{1}{n} \cdot n\mu = \mu

Efficiency

Efficiency

Let θ^1\hat{\theta}_1 and θ^2\hat{\theta}_2 both be unbiased estimators of the parameter θ\theta. If: Var(θ^1)<Var(θ^2)Var(\hat{\theta}_1) < Var(\hat{\theta}_2) then θ^1\hat{\theta}_1 is said to be more efficient than θ^2\hat{\theta}_2.

Significance: efficiency reflects the precision of an estimator; the smaller the variance, the more accurate the estimator.

Example 2: for a normal population N(μ,σ2)N(\mu, \sigma^2), the sample mean X‾\overline{X} is more efficient than a single observation X1X_1.

Proof: Var(X‾)=σ2n<σ2=Var(X1)Var(\overline{X}) = \frac{\sigma^2}{n} < \sigma^2 = Var(X_1)

Consistency

Consistent Estimator

If the estimator θ^n\hat{\theta}_n converges in probability to the parameter θ\theta, that is: θ^n→Pθ\hat{\theta}_n \xrightarrow{P} \theta then θ^n\hat{\theta}_n is called a consistent estimator of the parameter θ\theta.

Significance: consistency means that as the sample size increases, the estimator gets closer and closer to the true value.

Example 3: the sample mean X‾n\overline{X}_n is a consistent estimator of the population mean μ\mu.

Proof: by the law of large numbers, X‾n→Pμ\overline{X}_n \xrightarrow{P} \mu

Asymptotic Normality

Asymptotic Normality

If the standardized form of the estimator θ^n\hat{\theta}_n tends to a normal distribution, that is: θ^n−θVar(θ^n)→dN(0,1)\frac{\hat{\theta}_n - \theta}{\sqrt{Var(\hat{\theta}_n)}} \xrightarrow{d} N(0,1) then θ^n\hat{\theta}_n is said to have asymptotic normality.

Significance: asymptotic normality provides the theoretical foundation for constructing confidence intervals and conducting hypothesis tests.

Estimators for the Parameters of Common Distributions

Parameter Estimation for the Normal Distribution

Population: X∼N(μ,σ2)X \sim N(\mu, \sigma^2)

Mean estimation:

  • Unbiased estimator: μ^=X‾=1n∑i=1nXi\hat{\mu} = \overline{X} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n X_i
  • Properties: unbiased, efficient, consistent

Variance estimation:

  • Unbiased estimator: S2=1n−1∑i=1n(Xi−X‾)2S^2 = \frac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i - \overline{X})^2
  • Maximum likelihood estimator: σ^2=1n∑i=1n(Xi−X‾)2\hat{\sigma}^2 = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i - \overline{X})^2

Parameter Estimation for the Poisson Distribution

Population: X∼Poisson(λ)X \sim Poisson(\lambda)

Parameter estimation:

  • Unbiased estimator: λ^=X‾=1n∑i=1nXi\hat{\lambda} = \overline{X} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n X_i
  • Properties: unbiased, efficient, consistent

Parameter Estimation for the Exponential Distribution

Population: X∼Exp(λ)X \sim Exp(\lambda)

Parameter estimation:

  • Unbiased estimator: λ^=1X‾\hat{\lambda} = \frac{1}{\overline{X}}
  • Maximum likelihood estimator: λ^=1X‾\hat{\lambda} = \frac{1}{\overline{X}}

Parameter Estimation for the Uniform Distribution

Population: X∼U(a,b)X \sim U(a,b)

Parameter estimation:

  • Estimator of aa: a^=min⁡(X1,X2,…,Xn)\hat{a} = \min(X_1, X_2, \dots, X_n)
  • Estimator of bb: b^=max⁡(X1,X2,…,Xn)\hat{b} = \max(X_1, X_2, \dots, X_n)

Methods for Constructing Estimators

Method of Moments

Idea: equate the sample moments to the population moments and solve the resulting equation to obtain the estimator of the parameter.

Steps:

  1. Compute the population moments (expressed in terms of the parameters)
  2. Compute the sample moments
  3. Equate the sample moments to the population moments
  4. Solve the equation to obtain the estimator of the parameter

Example 4: let X∼Poisson(λ)X \sim Poisson(\lambda); estimate λ\lambda by the method of moments.

Solution:

  1. First population moment: E(X)=λE(X) = \lambda
  2. First sample moment: 1n∑i=1nXi=X‾\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n X_i = \overline{X}
  3. Set X‾=λ\overline{X} = \lambda
  4. We obtain λ^=X‾\hat{\lambda} = \overline{X}

Maximum Likelihood Estimation

Idea: choose as the estimator the parameter value that makes the observed sample values most likely to occur.

Steps:

  1. Construct the likelihood function L(θ)=∏i=1nf(xi;θ)L(\theta) = \prod_{i=1}^n f(x_i;\theta)
  2. Take the logarithm to obtain the log-likelihood function ln⁡L(θ)\ln L(\theta)
  3. Differentiate with respect to the parameter and set the derivative to zero
  4. Solve the equation to obtain the maximum likelihood estimator

Example 5: let X∼N(μ,σ2)X \sim N(\mu, \sigma^2); estimate μ\mu and σ2\sigma^2 by maximum likelihood estimation.

Solution:

  1. Likelihood function: L(μ,σ2)=∏i=1n12πσe−(xi−μ)22σ2L(\mu, \sigma^2) = \prod_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma} e^{-\frac{(x_i-\mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}}
  2. Log-likelihood function: ln⁡L(μ,σ2)=−n2ln⁡(2π)−n2ln⁡(σ2)−12σ2∑i=1n(xi−μ)2\ln L(\mu, \sigma^2) = -\frac{n}{2}\ln(2\pi) - \frac{n}{2}\ln(\sigma^2) - \frac{1}{2\sigma^2}\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i-\mu)^2
  3. Differentiate with respect to μ\mu: ∂ln⁡L∂μ=1σ2∑i=1n(xi−μ)=0\frac{\partial \ln L}{\partial \mu} = \frac{1}{\sigma^2}\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i-\mu) = 0
  4. Solving gives: μ^=X‾\hat{\mu} = \overline{X}
  5. Differentiate with respect to σ2\sigma^2: ∂ln⁡L∂σ2=−n2σ2+12σ4∑i=1n(xi−μ)2=0\frac{\partial \ln L}{\partial \sigma^2} = -\frac{n}{2\sigma^2} + \frac{1}{2\sigma^4}\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i-\mu)^2 = 0
  6. Solving gives: σ^2=1n∑i=1n(xi−X‾)2\hat{\sigma}^2 = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i-\overline{X})^2

Comparison of the Properties of Estimators

Unbiasedness and Efficiency

Relation: unbiasedness and efficiency are two different criteria; an estimator may be unbiased but not efficient, and may be efficient but biased.

Example 6: for a normal population N(μ,σ2)N(\mu, \sigma^2):

  • X‾\overline{X} is an unbiased estimator of μ\mu
  • 1n∑i=1nXi2\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n X_i^2 is an unbiased estimator of σ2+μ2\sigma^2 + \mu^2, but not an unbiased estimator of σ2\sigma^2

Consistency and Efficiency

Relation: consistency is an asymptotic property, while efficiency is a finite-sample property. An estimator may be consistent but not efficient, and may be efficient but not consistent.

Asymptotically Efficient Estimator

Asymptotically Efficient Estimator

If the estimator θ^n\hat{\theta}_n satisfies:

  1. Consistency: θ^n→Pθ\hat{\theta}_n \xrightarrow{P} \theta
  2. Asymptotic normality: n(θ^n−θ)→dN(0,σ2(θ))\sqrt{n}(\hat{\theta}_n - \theta) \xrightarrow{d} N(0, \sigma^2(\theta))
  3. Its variance attains the Cramér-Rao lower bound

then θ^n\hat{\theta}_n is called an asymptotically efficient estimator.

Exercises

Exercise 1

Let the population be X∼N(μ,σ2)X \sim N(\mu, \sigma^2), with sample mean X‾\overline{X} and sample variance S2S^2. Write the unbiased estimators of μ\mu and σ2\sigma^2.

point estimationunbiased estimationnormal population

Approach: Use the sample mean and the sample variance as unbiased estimators.

Steps:

  1. Unbiased estimator of μ\mu: μ^=X‾=1n∑i=1nXi\hat{\mu} = \overline{X} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n X_i
  2. Unbiased estimator of σ2\sigma^2: σ^2=S2=1n−1∑i=1n(Xi−X‾)2\hat{\sigma}^2 = S^2 = \frac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i - \overline{X})^2

Answer: μ^=X‾\hat{\mu} = \overline{X}, σ^2=S2\hat{\sigma}^2 = S^2

Exercise 2

Let X1,X2,…,XnX_1, X_2, \dots, X_n be a sample from the population X∼Poisson(λ)X \sim Poisson(\lambda). Prove that the sample mean X‾\overline{X} is an unbiased estimator of λ\lambda.

mathematical expectationlinearity of expectationcomputation

Approach: Use the linearity of expectation.

Steps:

  1. E(X‾)=E(1n∑i=1nXi)=1n∑i=1nE(Xi)E(\overline{X}) = E(\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n X_i) = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n E(X_i)
  2. Since Xi∼Poisson(λ)X_i \sim Poisson(\lambda), we have E(Xi)=λE(X_i) = \lambda
  3. E(X‾)=1n⋅nλ=λE(\overline{X}) = \frac{1}{n} \cdot n\lambda = \lambda
  4. Therefore X‾\overline{X} is an unbiased estimator of λ\lambda

Answer: the proof is complete

Exercise 3

Let X1,X2,…,XnX_1, X_2, \dots, X_n be a sample from the population X∼N(μ,σ2)X \sim N(\mu, \sigma^2). Compare 1n∑i=1n(Xi−X‾)2\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i - \overline{X})^2 and 1n−1∑i=1n(Xi−X‾)2\frac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i - \overline{X})^2, and determine which one is the unbiased estimator of σ2\sigma^2.

point estimationunbiased estimationproperties of estimators

Approach: Compute the expectations of the two estimators.

Steps:

  1. Let S2=1n−1∑i=1n(Xi−X‾)2S^2 = \frac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i - \overline{X})^2
  2. It is known that E(S2)=σ2E(S^2) = \sigma^2, that is, 1n−1∑i=1n(Xi−X‾)2\frac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i - \overline{X})^2 is unbiased
  3. Let σ^2=1n∑i=1n(Xi−X‾)2\hat{\sigma}^2 = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i - \overline{X})^2
  4. E(σ^2)=E(n−1nS2)=n−1nσ2≠σ2E(\hat{\sigma}^2) = E(\frac{n-1}{n}S^2) = \frac{n-1}{n}\sigma^2 \neq \sigma^2
  5. Therefore 1n∑i=1n(Xi−X‾)2\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i - \overline{X})^2 is not an unbiased estimator

Answer: 1n−1∑i=1n(Xi−X‾)2\frac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i - \overline{X})^2 is the unbiased estimator

Exercise 4

Let X1,X2,…,XnX_1, X_2, \dots, X_n be a sample from the population X∼U(0,θ)X \sim U(0, \theta). Estimate the parameter θ\theta by the method of moments.

parameter estimationmethod of momentssample moments

Approach: Use the method of moments, equating the sample moments to the population moments.

Steps:

  1. First population moment: E(X)=θ2E(X) = \frac{\theta}{2}
  2. First sample moment: X‾=1n∑i=1nXi\overline{X} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n X_i
  3. Set X‾=θ2\overline{X} = \frac{\theta}{2}
  4. Solving gives: θ^=2X‾\hat{\theta} = 2\overline{X}

Answer: θ^=2X‾\hat{\theta} = 2\overline{X}

Exercise 5

Consider the estimators θ^1,θ^2\hat{\theta}_1, \hat{\theta}_2. If Var(θ^1)<Var(θ^2)Var(\hat{\theta}_1)<Var(\hat{\theta}_2), which one is more efficient?

point estimationefficiencycomparison of estimators

Approach: Compare the variances of the two estimators.

Steps:

  1. If Var(θ^1)<Var(θ^2)Var(\hat{\theta}_1) < Var(\hat{\theta}_2)
  2. and both estimators are unbiased
  3. then θ^1\hat{\theta}_1 is more efficient than θ^2\hat{\theta}_2

Answer: θ^1\hat{\theta}_1 is more efficient


Summary

Symbols Used in This Article

Greek LetterPronunciationDescription
θ\thetaTheta (theta)denotes the population parameter
μ\muMu (mu)denotes the population mean
σ\sigmaSigma (sigma)denotes the population standard deviation

Found an issue with this content?

Tell us what could be improved.